DL ON FRIDAY, JULY 18TH
View: session overviewtalk overviewside by side with other conferences
| 08:45 | Invited Talk: Fragments of Logic, Language, and Computation SPEAKER: Patrick Blackburn ABSTRACT. Amsterdam-style logicians view modal logic as a fragment of classical logic, and description logicians view their own formalisms in much the same way. Moreover, first-order logic itself can be viewed as a modest fragment of the higher-order logics of Frege and Russell, a fragment with useful model-theoretic properties. All in all, the fine structure of logic is a key topic in contemporary research, as the intensive study of (say) the 2-variable and various guarded fragments attest. In this talk I want to consider the role of logical fragments in applications. I will focus on applications in natural language, as this is an area rich in non-monotonic and defeasible inference. Moreover, as my perspective is that of computational (rather than theoretical) linguistics, I am interested in efficient solutions to computational tasks - that is, in fragments of computation. Drawing on a running example involving applications of description logic and classical planning to a dialogue system, I will discuss the role of computation to provide 'pragmatic glue' that lets us work with small well-explored logical fragments, while simultaneously providing the dynamics required to model various forms of non-monotonicity. |
| 09:45 | On the Non-Monotonic Description Logic ALC+Tmin SPEAKER: Oliver Fernandez Gil ABSTRACT. In the last 20 years many proposals have been made to incorporate non-monotonic reasoning into description logics, ranging from approaches based on default logic and circumscription to those based on preferential semantics. In particular, the non-monotonic description logic ALC+Tmin uses a combination of the preferential semantics with minimization of a certain kind of concepts, which represent atypical instances of a class of elements. One of its drawbacks is that it suffers from the problem known as the property blocking inheritance, which can be seen as a weakness from an inferential point of view. In this paper we propose an extension of ALC+Tmin, namely ALC+T+min, with the purpose to solve the mentioned problem. In addition, we show the close connection that exists between ALC+T+min and concept-circumscribed knowledge bases. Finally, we study the complexity of deciding the classical reasoning tasks in ALC+T+min. |
| 14:30 | Gödel FL_0 with Greatest Fixed-Point Semantics SPEAKER: Stefan Borgwardt ABSTRACT. We study the fuzzy extension of FL_0 with semantics based on the Gödel t-norm. We show that gfp-subsumption w.r.t. a finite set of primitive definitions can be characterized by a relation on weighted automata, and use this result to provide tight complexity bounds for reasoning in this logic. |
| 14:55 | Fuzzy DLs over Finite Lattices with Nominals SPEAKER: Stefan Borgwardt ABSTRACT. The complexity of reasoning in fuzzy description logics over finite lattices usually does not exceed that of the underlying classical DLs. This has recently been shown for the logics between L-IALC and L-ISCHI using a combination of automata- and tableau-based techniques. In this paper, this approach is modified to deal with nominals and constants in L-ISCHOI. Reasoning w.r.t. general TBoxes is ExpTime-complete, and PSpace-completeness is shown under the restriction to acyclic terminologies in two sublogics. The latter implies two previously unknown complexity results for the classical DLs ALCHO and SO. |
| 15:20 | A MILP-based decision procedure for the (Fuzzy) Description Logic ALCB SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. To overcome the inability of Description Logics (DLs) to represent vague or imprecise information, several fuzzy extensions have been proposed in the literature. In this context, an important family of reasoning algorithms for fuzzy DLs is based on a combination of tableau algorithms and Operational Research (OR) problems, specifically using Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP). |
| 15:23 | Complexity sources in FDL SPEAKER: Marco Cerami ABSTRACT. In recent years many FDLs based on infinite t-norms have been proved to be undecidable. On the other hand, several FDLs based on finite t-norms, not only have been proved to be decidable, but they have been proved to belong to the same complexity classes as the corresponding crisp DLs. On the light of such results, a question that naturally arises is whether the finite-valued fuzzy framework is really more complex than the old crisp-valued formalism. The aim of this work is to analyze some of the complexity sources that are not present in the crisp framework. To this end, we will consider FDL languages with low expressivity that allow us to observe how the need for more complex deciding strategies, not required in the crisp framework, arises in many-valued FDLs. |
| 15:26 | Gödel Description Logics with General Models SPEAKER: Rafael Peñaloza ABSTRACT. In the last few years, the complexity of reasoning in fuzzy description logics has been studied in depth. Surprisingly, despite being arguably the simplest form of fuzzy semantics, not much is known about the complexity of reasoning in fuzzy description logics using the Gödel t-norm. It was recently shown that in the logic G-IALC under witnessed model semantics, all standard reasoning problems can be solved in exponential time, matching the complexity of reasoning in classical ALC. We show that this also holds under general model semantics. |
| 15:29 | Certain Answers in a Rough World SPEAKER: Veronika Thost ABSTRACT. Rough Description Logics have recently been studied as a means for representing and reasoning with imprecise knowledge. Real-world applications need to exploit reasoning over such knowledge in an efficient way. We describe how the combined approach to query answering can be extended to the rough setting. In particular, we extend both the canonical model and the rewriting procedure such that rough queries over rough EL ontologies can be answered by considering this information alone. |
| 15:32 | Bayesian Description Logics SPEAKER: Ismail Ilkan Ceylan ABSTRACT. We present Bayesian Description Logics (BDLs): an extension of Description Logics with contextual probabilities encoded in a Bayesian network (BN). Classical DL reasoning tasks are extended to consider also the contextual and probabilistic information in BDLs. A complexity analysis of these problems shows that, for propositionally closed DLs, this extension comes without cost, while for tractable DLs the complexity is affected by the cost of reasoning in the BN. |
| 15:35 | Reasoning about Belief Uncertainty in DL-Lite N bool SPEAKER: Ala Djeddai ABSTRACT. Dealing with uncertainty is a very important issue in description logics (DLs). In this paper, we present PrDL-lite N bool a new probabilistic extension of DL-Lite N bool, known as a very expressive DL-Lite, by supporting the belief degree interval in a single axiom or a set of axioms connected with conjunction (by ∧) or disjunction (by ∨) operators. The PrDL-lite N bool semantics is based on DL-Lite N bool features which are a new alternative semantics for DL-lite N bool having a finite structure and its number is always finite unlike classical models. PrDL-lite N bool also supports terminological and assertional probabilistic knowledge and the reasoning tasks (satisfiability, deciding the entailment, computing tight interval for entailment) are achieved by solving linear optimization problems. A prototype of the approach is implemented using OWLAPI for knowledge base creation, Pellet for reasoning and LpSolve for solving the linear programs. |
| 15:38 | Obfuscation of Semantic Data: Restricting the Spread of Sensitive Information SPEAKER: Federico Cerutti ABSTRACT. This paper investigates how to restrict the spread of sensitive information. This work is situated in a military context, and provides a tractable method to decide what semantic information to share, with whom, and how. The latter decision is supported by obfuscation, where a related concept or fact may be shared instead of the original. We consider uncertain information, and utilise Subjective Logic as an underlying formalism to further obfuscate concepts, and reason about obfuscated concepts. |
| 15:41 | Measuring Conceptual Similarity in Ontologies: How Bad is a Cheap Measure? SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. Several attempts have been made to develop similarity measures for ontologies. Motivated by finding problems in existing measures, we design a new family of measures to address these problems. We carry out two sets of empirical studies. Firstly, to explore how good the new measures are by comparing them to human judgments of similarity. Secondly, we investigate how likely it is to encounter specific task-oriented problems when using a bad similarity measure. |
| 15:44 | Mary, What's Like All Cats? SPEAKER: unknown ABSTRACT. In Description Logics (DL) knowledge bases (KBs) information is typically captured by crisp concepts. For many applications querying the KB by crisp query concepts is too restrictive. A controlled way of gradually relaxing a query concept can be achieved by the use of concept similarity. We formalize the task of instance query answering for crisp DL KBs using concepts relaxed by concept similarity measures (CSM). For the DL EL we investigate computation algorithms for this task, their complexity and properties for the employed CSM in case unfoldable TBoxes or general TBoxes are used. |